Book Review and Its Logic

By Sandra Williams


A book review is a description, critical analysis, and an evaluation on the quality, meaning, and significance of a book, not a retelling. It should focus on the book's purpose, content, and authority. A critical book review is not a book report or a summary. It is a reaction paper in which strengths and weaknesses of the material are analyzed. It should include a statement of what the author has tried to do, evaluate how well (in the opinion of the reviewer) the author has succeeded, and presents evidence to support this evaluation.
You can offer agreement or disagreement and identify where you find the work exemplary or deficient in its knowledge, judgments, or organization. You should clearly state your opinion of the work in question, and that statement will probably resemble other types of academic writing, with a thesis statement, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

There is no definitive method to writing a review, although some critical thinking about the work at hand is necessary before you actually begin writing. Thus, writing a review is a two-step process: developing an argument about the work under consideration, and making that argument as you write an organized and well-supported draft.

The determination of the book review is to communicate to the reader's mind the ideas and sensations the revieweBookEr experienced while researching the content. In this way, the reader knows what the author sought to transmit or what the reviewer experienced while reading. The reviewer, then, takes three roles: reporter, in informing the third party of the events; analyst, in making judgments based on experience; and sideline observer, in pretending to act as the reader should by expressing their own opinion, desires and expectations.

Is this book good or bad? This is the time for you to say so. Put the book in context. You might have been able to get this information from lo
The determination of the book review is to communicate to the reader's mind the ideas and sensations the revieweBookEr experienced while researching the content. In this way, the reader knows what the author sought to transmit or what the reviewer experienced while reading. The reviewer, then, takes three roles: reporter, in informing the third party of the events; analyst, in making judgments based on experience; and sideline observer, in pretending to act as the reader should by expressing their own opinion, desires and expectations.

Is this book good or bad? This is the time for you to say so. Put the book in context. You might have been able to get this information from looking at the book's cover and introduction. Check your aim. You've written your review. Now's the time to step back and apply this sort of reasoning to your own review.




About the Author:



Related Posts :

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus