After I wrote my second article about Patrick Swayze's tragic misplaced faith in mainstream medicine, a mainstream oncologist followed me to CureZone and chastised me with the following message:
I have been working as an oncologist/pathologist for over 20 years now and I am deeply shocked at the amount of misinformation that is spread on this website. I have been reading this site for quite some time now and have not been able to find any reliable information on cancer anywhere here, either on the nature of cancer or on the best way to treat it.
The way you abuse Patrick Swayze's death to rant against standard medicine and the implication that he would have been far better off if not cured with alternative medicine beggars any description.
Here is how I replied:
"You are shocked? I am appalled, sir!"
And I sir am deeply shocked at the misinformation that is constantly spread by mainstream medicine and the world pharma industries.
Are you proud of being in a profession that has failed so miserably against cancer since "The War on Cancer" was declared almost forty years ago and we were promised a cure within just a few years? What we have now, after all these many years and after all the billions that have been spent, is no mainstream cure in sight and a bloated $300-$400 Billion a year industry whose continued existence and profit depends on NOT finding a cure for cancer.
Meanwhile, despite statistical manipulations that try to put a positive spin on the abysmal results of mainstream cancer treatments, more people are coming down with cancer and dying of cancer every year.
Are you aware that you are part of a profession that is among the top three causes of death in the U.S. by the AMA's own admission, and which has such a sordid history of turning healing illness into managing illness for profit? Are you even aware of your profession's history? If not, see my article:
Modern Medicine: How Healing Illness became Managing Illness
It isn't what is taught in medical school, but it is hard to argue with history and facts.
I am further shocked that mainstream oncology continues to use the tried and failed methods of trying to cut out, burn out or poison out the mere symptoms of cancer without addressing the root causes of cancer and pays precious little attention to prevention or the roles of diet, lifestyle, proper nutrition, removal of toxins from the body and environment, and stress.
Beyond being shocked, I am absolutely appalled at how mainstream medicine has suppressed and persecuted natural alternatives to their injurious unnatural drugs and invasive treatments. To get an idea of just how far your profession and those who control it will go to prevent competition, I suggest you read "Politics in Healing: The suppression and manipulation of American Medicine." by former New York State Assemblyman Daniel Haley. Shameful beyond belief!
Why is it that over 75% of oncologists surveyed said they would not take chemo if they had cancer due to it's low success rates and horrific side effects and yet in over 75% of the instances these same oncologists prescribe chemo for their cancer patients? Could it be because the typical oncologist derives about 75% of their income from the markups they make on the chemo drugs they prescribe?
Is your own livelihood and lifestyle supported in great part by dispensing toxic chemotherapy drugs which are often themselves Class 1 carcinogens? Are you aware that the "gold standard" of chemo, Taxol, can result in "extensive metastasis months or even years later" due to it causing "a massive release of (cancer) cells into circulation", as was reported at the 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Do you wonder, or can you explain, why this spread of cancer is not even listed among the side effects of Taxol?
Did you receive a "science-based" education at a university largely funded by pharmaceutical companies which - surprise! surprise! - taught you that the way to treat illness is to prescribe approved medicines made by guess who? And which taught virtually nothing about diet, prevention or natural alternatives?
One doctor friend of mine said that in his entire time in medical school he only experienced one single lecture on diet and nutrition. This same doctor, who became an MD almost 40 years ago, switched to naturopathic treatment about 15 years ago because he saw that he was merely managing symptoms with drugs that led to more illness and more drugs in a never ending cycle. He said that it was a highly profitable system, but he became a doctor in the first place because he wanted to heal people, and mainstream drugs and methods weren't getting the job done.
If you believe that implying that Patrick Swayze might have been better off by using alternative methods "beggars description", then how would you describe the fact that mainstream medicine has a virtually zero percent five year survival rate for pancreatic cancer when there are many people still alive after five years who chose natural and alternative treatments for their pancreatic cancers?
I am further appalled, though not surprised, that a mainstream medical education failed to teach you that, while you may be able to kill or slow down the proliferation of a virus by starving the body, if the body is starved the cancer cells simply consume the body's cells, tissues and organs around them and they will mutate healthy cells and keep on multiplying.
The chemotherapy your profession prescribes 75% of the time exacerbates the problem by not only damaging the immune system but also by indiscriminately killing and injuring healthy cells, causing diseased areas of the body which lead to additional disease and shut-down of various organs. Shut-down of the body (physical death) is the eventual result. If medical school had properly taught you about the importance of nutrition and the role of the immune system, nature's first line of defense against cancer and other illness, then you would know that it takes all the nutrients the body needs, including whole foods, fats and proteins, to produce and maintain a healthy immune system.
Yes, your profession surely did wonders for Swayze by telling him to "starve his body to starve his cancer" and watching him end up dying of wasting disease.
Tony Isaacs, is a natural health researcher and author of books and articles about natural health including " Cancer's Natural Enemy " and is a featured writer for such natural and alternative health venues as Natural News, The Crusader, Healthiernewstalk and more. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to live longer, healthier and happier lives and he serves as a featured writer and consultant to the nationally famous Utopia Silver colloidal silver and natural supplement company. He is currently working on a major book project due for publication next year.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tony_Isaacs
I have been working as an oncologist/pathologist for over 20 years now and I am deeply shocked at the amount of misinformation that is spread on this website. I have been reading this site for quite some time now and have not been able to find any reliable information on cancer anywhere here, either on the nature of cancer or on the best way to treat it.
The way you abuse Patrick Swayze's death to rant against standard medicine and the implication that he would have been far better off if not cured with alternative medicine beggars any description.
Here is how I replied:
"You are shocked? I am appalled, sir!"
And I sir am deeply shocked at the misinformation that is constantly spread by mainstream medicine and the world pharma industries.
Are you proud of being in a profession that has failed so miserably against cancer since "The War on Cancer" was declared almost forty years ago and we were promised a cure within just a few years? What we have now, after all these many years and after all the billions that have been spent, is no mainstream cure in sight and a bloated $300-$400 Billion a year industry whose continued existence and profit depends on NOT finding a cure for cancer.
Meanwhile, despite statistical manipulations that try to put a positive spin on the abysmal results of mainstream cancer treatments, more people are coming down with cancer and dying of cancer every year.
Are you aware that you are part of a profession that is among the top three causes of death in the U.S. by the AMA's own admission, and which has such a sordid history of turning healing illness into managing illness for profit? Are you even aware of your profession's history? If not, see my article:
Modern Medicine: How Healing Illness became Managing Illness
It isn't what is taught in medical school, but it is hard to argue with history and facts.
I am further shocked that mainstream oncology continues to use the tried and failed methods of trying to cut out, burn out or poison out the mere symptoms of cancer without addressing the root causes of cancer and pays precious little attention to prevention or the roles of diet, lifestyle, proper nutrition, removal of toxins from the body and environment, and stress.
Beyond being shocked, I am absolutely appalled at how mainstream medicine has suppressed and persecuted natural alternatives to their injurious unnatural drugs and invasive treatments. To get an idea of just how far your profession and those who control it will go to prevent competition, I suggest you read "Politics in Healing: The suppression and manipulation of American Medicine." by former New York State Assemblyman Daniel Haley. Shameful beyond belief!
Why is it that over 75% of oncologists surveyed said they would not take chemo if they had cancer due to it's low success rates and horrific side effects and yet in over 75% of the instances these same oncologists prescribe chemo for their cancer patients? Could it be because the typical oncologist derives about 75% of their income from the markups they make on the chemo drugs they prescribe?
Is your own livelihood and lifestyle supported in great part by dispensing toxic chemotherapy drugs which are often themselves Class 1 carcinogens? Are you aware that the "gold standard" of chemo, Taxol, can result in "extensive metastasis months or even years later" due to it causing "a massive release of (cancer) cells into circulation", as was reported at the 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Do you wonder, or can you explain, why this spread of cancer is not even listed among the side effects of Taxol?
Did you receive a "science-based" education at a university largely funded by pharmaceutical companies which - surprise! surprise! - taught you that the way to treat illness is to prescribe approved medicines made by guess who? And which taught virtually nothing about diet, prevention or natural alternatives?
One doctor friend of mine said that in his entire time in medical school he only experienced one single lecture on diet and nutrition. This same doctor, who became an MD almost 40 years ago, switched to naturopathic treatment about 15 years ago because he saw that he was merely managing symptoms with drugs that led to more illness and more drugs in a never ending cycle. He said that it was a highly profitable system, but he became a doctor in the first place because he wanted to heal people, and mainstream drugs and methods weren't getting the job done.
If you believe that implying that Patrick Swayze might have been better off by using alternative methods "beggars description", then how would you describe the fact that mainstream medicine has a virtually zero percent five year survival rate for pancreatic cancer when there are many people still alive after five years who chose natural and alternative treatments for their pancreatic cancers?
I am further appalled, though not surprised, that a mainstream medical education failed to teach you that, while you may be able to kill or slow down the proliferation of a virus by starving the body, if the body is starved the cancer cells simply consume the body's cells, tissues and organs around them and they will mutate healthy cells and keep on multiplying.
The chemotherapy your profession prescribes 75% of the time exacerbates the problem by not only damaging the immune system but also by indiscriminately killing and injuring healthy cells, causing diseased areas of the body which lead to additional disease and shut-down of various organs. Shut-down of the body (physical death) is the eventual result. If medical school had properly taught you about the importance of nutrition and the role of the immune system, nature's first line of defense against cancer and other illness, then you would know that it takes all the nutrients the body needs, including whole foods, fats and proteins, to produce and maintain a healthy immune system.
Yes, your profession surely did wonders for Swayze by telling him to "starve his body to starve his cancer" and watching him end up dying of wasting disease.
Tony Isaacs, is a natural health researcher and author of books and articles about natural health including " Cancer's Natural Enemy " and is a featured writer for such natural and alternative health venues as Natural News, The Crusader, Healthiernewstalk and more. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to live longer, healthier and happier lives and he serves as a featured writer and consultant to the nationally famous Utopia Silver colloidal silver and natural supplement company. He is currently working on a major book project due for publication next year.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tony_Isaacs